?

Log in

Next Entry

WELCOME!!!!




Welcome to the Art community!
Feel free to post questions, musings, pictures of paintings (or other media), your own paintings etc
I promise to keep this a  nice, flame-free community of people with a common interest in art.

To start out our discussions, I have two topics for you:

1. Madame X
The painting at the top is a detail from Madame X (1883-1884), John Singer Sargent. He was greatly criticized for the original work, which featured the woman with the right strap of her dress slipped off. Here is a picture of what the original painting looked like:


 
Even after changing it, the painting remain controversial.
Why do you think it caused such an critical storm? After all, by 1883 nudes were nothing new in painting.
Should he have changed it under the pressure of his contemporaries? Does it change that value of the work knowing that the artist intended it to look differently?

2. Cave Art



Why do you think the hunter-gatherer decided to go into a cave to create art?
How did he feel, how did his tribe feel?
Was there a religious purpose, or was it an attempt to create order in the chaos that the primitive man was experiencing?
Why are people inherently drawn to creating art?


Deviations from these questions are encouraged, I just put the questions here to get you started.


Have Fun!
Your friendly, neighbourhood moderator.

Comments

amalia_slava
Jan. 7th, 2009 06:38 am (UTC)
lol: "Okay guys, have we hunted?" "Yes, Ooog, we've hunted" "well..have we mated?" "Yes Ooog, we have mated." "Alright. Let's go paint then!"

That seemed really funny in mind for some reason.

You're right, I suppose, about sexuality in Madame X warranting its notoriety. What I'm confused about is why nudes in...say...as far back as Renaissance paintings were not an issue, and suddenly, when the Church and even social standards have slackened, a woman whose neck suggests sexuality is so greatly criticized.

Why didn't early man ever draw people? Were other tribesmen not important in their lives?
red_castles
Jan. 8th, 2009 07:37 pm (UTC)
XD. Yeah, that is kind of funny once you think about it. Haha.

That's a good question. In church cathedrals it's not uncommon to see "pagan" imagery painted on their ceilings. There was one in particular (whose name I can't remember right now) that had paintings of half naked men and women and characters from Greek mythology on it's ceiling. But on the flipside, if a woman shows a little skin, it's considered immoral. I'm not sure why that is. XD

Perhaps the reason that animals were the only subjects they painted was because they were an important factor to their survival? They used them for food and clothing and without those, they probably wouldn't have been able to survive.

Profile

For The Love of God, Hirst
dissect_apollo
Understanding Art and the Art World

Latest Month

January 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow